On Tue, May 21, 2024 at 11:03:41AM -0500, Pierre-Louis Bossart wrote: > On 5/21/24 10:12, Mark Brown wrote: > > On Tue, May 21, 2024 at 08:43:09AM -0500, Pierre-Louis Bossart wrote: > > This is something we could do properly if we had full digital routing > > rather than bolting things on the side of the CPU<->CODEC model - having > > these things where we have to take a CODEC into account even though > > we're not actually using it is one of the big issues with DPCM. > No disagreement here, these echo references and loopbacks are ugly to > support with the dependency between playback and capture directions that > isn't well handled, e.g. if someone starts to capture before playback > started. > For now we're kind of stuck, what I would suggest is just to remove the > extra check that both CPU and codec dai can support a direction, and > move on with the other cleanups suggested by Morimoto-san. Oh, I agree - my point is that as things stand the framework really can't cope with what needs expressing so we need these things that don't look quite right.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
