On Fri, May 17, 2024 at 05:05:41AM -0400, Elinor Montmasson wrote: > From: "Mark Brown" <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx> > > This description (and the code) don't feel like they're actually generic > > - they're clearly specific to the bidrectional S/PDIF case. I'd expect > > something called -generic to cope with single CODECs as well as double, > > and not to have any constraints on what those are. > I proposed, in an reply of the v3 patch series to Krzysztof Kozlowski, > the compatible "fsl,imx-audio-no-codec" instead of "generic". > Krzysztof thought it was too generic, but it would convey more clearly > that it is for cases without codec driver. > Would this other compatible string be more appropriate ? No. There is very clearly a CODEC here, it physically exists, we can point at it on the board and it has a software representation. Your code is also very specific to the two CODEC case.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
