On Tue, 30 Apr 2024 14:10:27 +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote: > > There is a confusing pattern in the kernel to use a variable named 'timeout' to > store the result of wait_for_completion_timeout() causing patterns like: > > timeout = wait_for_completion_timeout(...) > if (!timeout) return -ETIMEDOUT; > > with all kinds of permutations. Use 'time_left' as a variable to make the code > self explaining. > > Fix to the proper variable type 'unsigned long' while here. > > Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Thanks, applied now to for-next branch. Takashi