On Fri, 05 Apr 2024 12:07:57 +0200, Oswald Buddenhagen wrote: > > On Fri, Apr 05, 2024 at 11:20:32AM +0200, Takashi Iwai wrote: > > On Thu, 04 Apr 2024 12:00:31 +0200, > > Oswald Buddenhagen wrote: > >> > >> --- > >> This patch series needs to be applied on top of the patch titled > >> "Revert "ALSA: emu10k1: fix synthesizer sample playback position and > >> caching"". > > > > The patch set isn't cleanly applicable even after the revert patch. > > The patch 7 fails. > > > > Please rebase to the latest for-linus branch and resubmit. > > > this makes no sense; i'm getting a bit-identical patch after the rebase > (which is unsurprising, as the file in question wasn't touched in > years). > > are you sure you didn't corrupt the patch somehow (it happened before, > cf. summary of c960b012ec47)? or maybe you have an unpublished > conflicting commit? > > if there is an actual problem and you just named the wrong patch, then i > suspect that it's just git-am being stupid - the rebases from 6.8 and > later from your master from about a week ago went through smoothly. No, I used b4 at this time, and such a failure shouldn't happen. Try by yourself to apply the submitted patch mails with git-am on the latest for-linus (or master) branch. thanks, Takashi
