On Mon, 01 Apr 2024 13:18:36 +0200, Oswald Buddenhagen wrote: > > On Mon, Apr 01, 2024 at 12:51:32PM +0200, Takashi Iwai wrote: > > Could you give Fixes tag in each commit if it's a regression fix for > > the corresponding commit? > > > i did. you'll see it when the later patches arrive (minor hiccup with > mail delivery on my end ...). > > of course this won't help a lot with picking to stable, because the fix > actually depends on several of the prior patches. i can re-arrange the > series to minimize the hard dependency chain, but it will still be ~10 > patches. > > an alternative approach would be just reverting the offending patch and > re-fixing it as part of the subsequent series. the revert would be > easily pickable, but that merely replaces the current problem with the > (admittedly less audible) previous problem. your choice. Judging from the amount of patches, I prefer a quicker "fix" for the known regression, so a revert-and-rewrite sounds more like a reasonable approach. Care to resubmit with that? thanks, Takashi
