On Fri 15 Mar 2024 at 02:21, Jan Dakinevich <jan.dakinevich@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Add "amlogic,a1-sound-card" compatible string alias to > "amlogic,axg-sound-card". > > Signed-off-by: Jan Dakinevich <jan.dakinevich@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > .../devicetree/bindings/sound/amlogic,axg-sound-card.yaml | 6 +++++- > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sound/amlogic,axg-sound-card.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sound/amlogic,axg-sound-card.yaml > index 5db718e4d0e7..492b41cc8ccd 100644 > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sound/amlogic,axg-sound-card.yaml > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sound/amlogic,axg-sound-card.yaml > @@ -14,7 +14,11 @@ allOf: > > properties: > compatible: > - const: amlogic,axg-sound-card > + oneOf: > + - const: amlogic,axg-sound-card > + - items: > + - const: amlogic,a1-sound-card > + - const: amlogic,axg-sound-card I know the rule about SoC related name but it is different here. This does not describe HW in the SoC. The axg sound card is just a name, much like simple-card or audio-graph-card. I could have named it "amlogic,my-awesome-card" We would not add "amlogic,a1-simple-card", would we ? It is purely a software component, which aggregate HW ones. > audio-aux-devs: > $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/phandle-array -- Jerome
