On 16/02/2024 00:12, Stephen Boyd wrote: > Quoting Krzysztof Kozlowski (2024-02-08 08:37:10) >> None of the implementations of the get() and get_hw() callbacks of >> "struct of_clk_provider" modify the contents of received of_phandle_args >> pointer. They treat it as read-only variable used to find the clock to >> return. Make obvious that implementations are not supposed to modify >> the of_phandle_args, by making it a pointer to const. >> >> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxx> >> --- > > This will almost certainly break the build once it is merged to > linux-next. What's your plan to merge this? First problem is that it might not apply... I prepared it on next to be sure all subsystems are updated. The idea is to get reviews and acks and then: 1. Maybe it applies cleanly to your tree meaning there will be no conflicts with other trees, 2. If not, then I can keep rebasing it and it should be applied after rc1. Best regards, Krzysztof
