Re: kernelci/kernelci.org bisection: baseline-nfs.bootrr.deferred-probe-empty on at91sam9g20ek

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Jan 17, 2024 at 06:55:09AM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:

> This is also in the following kernel releases:
> 	4.19.240 5.4.191 5.10.113
> do they also have issues?  Does 6.1 and newer work properly?

Current kernels work well, I've not had reports generated for the older
kernels but it's possible they may be forthcoming (the bisection does
tend to send issues slowly sometimes).

> And wow, this is old, nice to see it reported, but for a commit that
> landed in April, 2022?  Does that mean that no one uses this hardware?

I suspect it's just me, it's in my test lab.  I don't routinely test
stable (just let KernelCI use it to test stable).

> I'll be glad to revert, but should I also revert for 4.19.y and 5.4.y
> and 5.10.y?

I'd be tempted to, though it's possible it's some other related issue so
it might be safest to hold off until there's an explicit report.  Up to
you.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


[Index of Archives]     [ALSA User]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Pulse Audio]     [Kernel Archive]     [Asterisk PBX]     [Photo Sharing]     [Linux Sound]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux