On Tue, Nov 28, 2023 at 06:49:23PM +0100, Thierry Reding wrote:
>
> On Wed, 08 Nov 2023 11:43:26 +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> > Merging
> > =======
> > I propose to take entire patchset through my tree (Samsung SoC), because:
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> > 1. Next cycle two new SoCs will be coming (Google GS101 and ExynosAutov920), so
> > they will touch the same lines in some of the DT bindings (not all, though).
> > It is reasonable for me to take the bindings for the new SoCs, to have clean
> > `make dtbs_check` on the new DTS.
> > 2. Having it together helps me to have clean `make dtbs_check` within my tree
> > on the existing DTS.
> > 3. No drivers are affected by this change.
> > 4. I plan to do the same for Tesla FSD and Exynos ARM32 SoCs, thus expect
> > follow up patchsets.
> >
> > [...]
>
> Applied, thanks!
>
> [12/17] dt-bindings: pwm: samsung: add specific compatibles for existing SoC
> commit: 5d67b8f81b9d598599366214e3b2eb5f84003c9f
You didn't honor (or even comment) Krzysztof's proposal to take the
whole patchset via his tree (marked above). Was there some off-list
agreement?
Best regards
Uwe
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-König |
Industrial Linux Solutions | https://www.pengutronix.de/ |
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
