On Wed, Oct 04, 2023 at 03:00:40PM -0400, Pierre-Louis Bossart wrote: > On 10/4/23 11:40, Mark Brown wrote: > > FWIW DT is much less affected here since all the inter-device references > > are explicit in the DT (modulo needing to work around breakage) so we're > > not hard coding in the way ACPI so unfortunately requires. > Isn't there a contradiction between making "all inter-device references > explicit in the DT" and having a device name use an IDA, which cannot > possibly known ahead of time? No, the thing with DT is that we don't use the device name for binding at all - it's printed in things but it's not part of how we do lookups (unless there's something I didn't notice in the Soundwire specifics I guess). Lookups are done with inter-node references in the DT.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
