On 9/16/23 19:22, Javier Carrasco wrote:
Defining the 'len' variable inside the 'patten_buf' as unsigned
makes it more consistent with its actual meaning and the rest of the
size variables in the test. Moreover, this removes an implicit
conversion in the fscanf function call.
Considering the fact that the pattern buffer length can't be negative or
larger that 4096, I really don't think that it is a necessary change.
Additionally, remove the unused variable 'it' from the reset_ioctl test.
Your patches should always contain only one logical change. If you, for
instance, remove redundant blank lines, combining it with something else
is fine, but otherwise you should split the changes up.
Signed-off-by: Javier Carrasco <javier.carrasco.cruz@xxxxxxxxx>
---
Defining the 'len' variable inside the 'patten_buf' as unsigned
makes it more consistent with its actual meaning and the rest of the
size variables in the test. Moreover, this removes an implicit
conversion in the fscanf function call.
Additionally, remove the unused variable 'it' from the reset_ioctl test.
You don't need this text here. Usually it is the place for changelog
between patch versions if we have more than one version of the patch.
For instance, if you send a patch V2, it could look like this:
Signed-off-by: ...
---
V1 -> V2:
- Improve something
- Add something
So, don't repeat the commit message here :)
Anyway, great job! I believe this test could be enhanced in lots of
ways, so I look forward to seeing new patches related to it from you :)
--
Kind regards,
Ivan Orlov
