On Tue, Sep 12, 2023 at 07:13:32PM +0100, Conor Dooley wrote: > Yo, > > I'm not au fait enough with this to leave particularly meaningful > comments, so just some minor ones for you. > > On Tue, Sep 12, 2023 at 12:14:44PM +0200, Herve Codina wrote: > > The Lantiq PEF2256 is a framer and line interface component designed to > > fulfill all required interfacing between an analog E1/T1/J1 line and the > > digital PCM system highway/H.100 bus. > > > > Signed-off-by: Herve Codina <herve.codina@xxxxxxxxxxx> > > Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Missing a co-developed-by? Whomever sends the patch should have the last Sob. > > > --- > > .../bindings/net/lantiq,pef2256.yaml | 214 ++++++++++++++++++ > > 1 file changed, 214 insertions(+) > > create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/lantiq,pef2256.yaml > > > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/lantiq,pef2256.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/lantiq,pef2256.yaml > > new file mode 100644 > > index 000000000000..c4f21678bf6a > > --- /dev/null > > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/lantiq,pef2256.yaml > > @@ -0,0 +1,214 @@ > > +# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause) > > +%YAML 1.2 > > +--- > > +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/net/lantiq,pef2256.yaml# > > +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml# > > + > > +title: Lantiq PEF2256 > > + > > +maintainers: > > + - Herve Codina <herve.codina@xxxxxxxxxxx> > > + > > +description: > > + The Lantiq PEF2256, also known as Infineon PEF2256 or FALC56, is a framer and > > + line interface component designed to fulfill all required interfacing between > > + an analog E1/T1/J1 line and the digital PCM system highway/H.100 bus. > > + > > +properties: > > + compatible: > > + items: > > + - const: lantiq,pef2256 > > + > > + reg: > > + maxItems: 1 > > + > > + clocks: > > + items: > > + - description: Master clock > > My OCD is rather upset by the inconsistent capitalisation used here :/ > > > + - description: System Clock Receive > > + - description: System Clock Transmit > > + > > + clock-names: > > + items: > > + - const: mclk > > + - const: sclkr > > + - const: sclkx > > + > > + interrupts: > > + maxItems: 1 > > + > > + reset-gpios: > > + description: > > + GPIO used to reset the device. > > + maxItems: 1 > > + > > + pinctrl: > > + $ref: /schemas/pinctrl/pinctrl.yaml# > > + additionalProperties: false > > + > > + patternProperties: > > + '-pins$': > > + type: object > > + $ref: /schemas/pinctrl/pinmux-node.yaml# > > + additionalProperties: false > > + > > + properties: > > + pins: > > + enum: [ RPA, RPB, RPC, RPD, XPA, XPB, XPC, XPD ] > > + > > + function: > > + enum: [ SYPR, RFM, RFMB, RSIGM, RSIG, DLR, FREEZE, RFSP, LOS, > > + SYPX, XFMS, XSIG, TCLK, XMFB, XSIGM, DLX, XCLK, XLT, > > + GPI, GPOH, GPOL ] > > + > > + required: > > + - pins > > + - function > > + > > + lantiq,data-rate-bps: > > + $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/uint32 > > + enum: [2048000, 4096000, 8192000, 16384000] > > -kBps is a standard suffix, would it be worth using that instead here? > What you have would fit as even multiples. > Otherwise Rob, should dt-schema grow -bps as a standard suffix? Yeah, I think that makes sense. I've added it now. Rob
