On Mon, Aug 28, 2023 at 12:05:21PM -0500, Vlad Karpovich wrote: > Checks the index computed by the virq offset before printing the > error condition in cs35l45_spk_safe_err() handler. > > Signed-off-by: Ricardo Rivera-Matos <rriveram@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Signed-off-by: Vlad Karpovich <vkarpovi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > sound/soc/codecs/cs35l45.c | 5 ++++- > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/sound/soc/codecs/cs35l45.c b/sound/soc/codecs/cs35l45.c > index 40fb64904260..2c9b41171a05 100644 > --- a/sound/soc/codecs/cs35l45.c > +++ b/sound/soc/codecs/cs35l45.c > @@ -1023,7 +1023,10 @@ static irqreturn_t cs35l45_spk_safe_err(int irq, void *data) > > i = irq - regmap_irq_get_virq(cs35l45->irq_data, 0); > > - dev_err(cs35l45->dev, "%s condition detected!\n", cs35l45_irqs[i].name); > + if (i < 0 || i > 6) This looks a little odd, there appear to be 8 IRQs attached to this function whereas this says 6. Also this check seems like it will be hard to keep in sync as things change. Assuming this error check is actually necessary, would it be perhaps better to check i is smaller than ARRAY_SIZE(cs35l45_irqs) and check that the attached function is cs35l45_spk_safe_err. That should be more robust against future changes to the IRQs. Thanks, Charles
