On Fri, Aug 25, 2023 at 4:16 AM Takashi Iwai <tiwai@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > Thanks for the patches. But, as the 6.6 merge window open is pretty > close, I'd postpone those unless it's urgently needed. I have no timeline since we have the workaround in, hence the RFC > > Also, before moving the resource tied with the device object, we'll > need a refcount to the ctl dev from pcm dev, as PCM does release chmap > at its free path (calling free_chmap()). Otherwise it'll lead to > another UAF, if both objects releases are done asynchronously without > dependency. Got it, thanks. > > > BTW, the cover letter and the subject prefix of the patches don't > match, and also the cover letter didn't include Cc. Please try to > make both cover letter and patches sent properly. Thanks for catching that, I was struggling getting cc to copy across with git from get_maintainers. I will give it another shot with v2. Curtis > > > thanks, > > > Takashi
