On Fri, 18 Aug 2023 18:30:42 +0200,
Pierre-Louis Bossart wrote:
>
> The code doesn't look too bad but needs a bit more work. There are quite
> a few error handling issues, pm_runtime needs to be revisited and
> ACPI/EFI as well.
>
> > +enum calib_data {
>
> tas2781_calib_data?
Well, as long as it's a local stuff, a suffix isn't really needed.
If it makes thing too confusing, it should be named properly, of
course, though.
> > +static int tas2781_read_acpi(struct tasdevice_priv *p, const char *hid)
> > +{
> > + struct acpi_device *adev;
> > + struct device *physdev;
> > + LIST_HEAD(resources);
> > + const char *sub;
> > + int ret;
> > +
> > + adev = acpi_dev_get_first_match_dev(hid, NULL, -1);
> > + if (!adev) {
> > + dev_err(p->dev,
> > + "Failed to find an ACPI device for %s\n", hid);
> > + return -ENODEV;
> > + }
>
> [1] need to take care of a resource leak here
Right, and that's rather a typo at the end of the function...
> > +err:
> > + dev_err(p->dev, "read acpi error, ret: %d\n", ret);
> > + put_device(physdev);
... this must be put_device(adev) instead physdev.
> > +static void tas2781_hda_playback_hook(struct device *dev, int action)
> > +{
> > + struct tasdevice_priv *tas_priv = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> > +
> > + dev_dbg(tas_priv->dev, "%s: action = %d\n", __func__, action);
> > + switch (action) {
> > + case HDA_GEN_PCM_ACT_OPEN:
> > + pm_runtime_get_sync(dev);
>
> test if this actually works?
To be fair, most of driver codes don't check it, including the
HD-audio core. (Actually, over 900 of 1300 calls have no check in the
whole tree.)
It implies that forcing the check in each place is moot; rather the
helper needs to be coded not to fail, IMO.
> > +static int tasdevice_hda_clamp(int val, int max)
> > +{
> > + if (val > max)
> > + val = max;
> > +
> > + if (val < 0)
> > + val = 0;
> > + return val;
> > +}
>
> I've seen that macro in the TAS2783 code as well, that sounds like a
> good helper function to share?
There is already clamp() macro, and I guess it can be replaced with
clamp(val, 0, max).
> > +
> > + comps->dev = dev;
> > +
> > + strscpy(comps->name, dev_name(dev), sizeof(comps->name));
> > +
> > + ret = tascodec_init(tas_priv, codec, tasdev_fw_ready);
> > + if (ret)
> > + return ret;
>
> need to do a put_autosuspend below, this is leaking a refcount.
Right, that needs an obvious leak. Let's fix it.
> > +static int tas2781_system_suspend(struct device *dev)
> > +{
> > + struct tasdevice_priv *tas_priv = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> > + int ret;
> > +
> > + dev_dbg(tas_priv->dev, "System Suspend\n");
> > +
> > + ret = pm_runtime_force_suspend(dev);
> > + if (ret)
> > + return ret;
>
> that's usually the other way around, for system suspend you either want
> the device to be pm_runtime active, or if it's already suspended do nothing.
>
> This is very odd to me.
This is a normal procedure, as stated in pm_runtime_force_suspend()
definition:
/**
* pm_runtime_force_suspend - Force a device into suspend state if needed.
....
* Typically this function may be invoked from a system suspend callback to make
* sure the device is put into low power state and it should only be used during
* system-wide PM transitions to sleep states. It assumes that the analogous
* pm_runtime_force_resume() will be used to resume the device.
thanks,
Takashi
