Hi Rob, On Wed, 2 Aug 2023 18:42:59 -0600 Rob Herring <robh@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Wed, Jul 26, 2023 at 05:02:23PM +0200, Herve Codina wrote: > > A framer can be connected to the QMC HDLC. > > If present, this framer is the interface between the TDM used by the QMC > > HDLC and the E1/T1 line. > > The QMC HDLC can use this framer to get information about the line and > > configure the line. > > > > Add an optional framer property to reference the framer itself. > > > > Signed-off-by: Herve Codina <herve.codina@xxxxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/fsl,qmc-hdlc.yaml | 5 +++++ > > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+) > > > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/fsl,qmc-hdlc.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/fsl,qmc-hdlc.yaml > > index 8bb6f34602d9..bf29863ab419 100644 > > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/fsl,qmc-hdlc.yaml > > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/fsl,qmc-hdlc.yaml > > @@ -27,6 +27,11 @@ properties: > > Should be a phandle/number pair. The phandle to QMC node and the QMC > > channel to use. > > > > + framer: > > + $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/phandle > > Now you've defined this property twice. Please avoid doing that. I don't see what you mean. I previously defined the framer property at the framer-codec node as it is a framer consumer (it was a mistake because this framer-codec node is a child of the framer node but that's an other story). Here, at the qmc-hdlc node, I define this property in order to use the framer as a consumer too. What is wrong ? Best regards, Hervé > > > + description: > > + phandle to the framer node > > + > > required: > > - compatible > > - fsl,qmc-chan > > -- > > 2.41.0 > >
