On Mon, Jul 31, 2023 at 09:30:29PM +0200, Takashi Iwai wrote: > Mark Brown wrote: > > It really feels like we ought to rename, or add an alias for, the type > > if we're going to start using it more widely - it's not helping to make > > the code clearer. > That was my very first impression, too, but I changed my mind after > seeing the already used code. An alias might work, either typedef or > define genptr_t or such as sockptr_t. But we'll need to copy the > bunch of helper functions, too... I would predict that if the type becomes more widely used that'll happen eventually and the longer it's left the more work it'll be.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
