MAX98926 and MAX98927 are quite similar and use the same bindings,
although drivers were not implementing them in the same way:
MAX98926 has boolean "interleave-mode" but MAX98927 has uint32
"interleave_mode". Unify them under maxim,interleave-mode, already used
in other Maxim device.
Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
Changes in v2:
1. New patch
---
sound/soc/codecs/max98926.c | 3 ++-
sound/soc/codecs/max98927.c | 16 ++++++++--------
2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/sound/soc/codecs/max98926.c b/sound/soc/codecs/max98926.c
index bdc508e23e59..922ce0dc4e60 100644
--- a/sound/soc/codecs/max98926.c
+++ b/sound/soc/codecs/max98926.c
@@ -528,7 +528,8 @@ static int max98926_i2c_probe(struct i2c_client *i2c)
"Failed to allocate regmap: %d\n", ret);
goto err_out;
}
- if (of_property_read_bool(i2c->dev.of_node, "interleave-mode"))
+ if (of_property_read_bool(i2c->dev.of_node, "maxim,interleave-mode") ||
+ of_property_read_bool(i2c->dev.of_node, "interleave-mode"))
max98926->interleave_mode = true;
if (!of_property_read_u32(i2c->dev.of_node, "vmon-slot-no", &value)) {
diff --git a/sound/soc/codecs/max98927.c b/sound/soc/codecs/max98927.c
index 0aaf2e6ae78d..e20aa5b1bce9 100644
--- a/sound/soc/codecs/max98927.c
+++ b/sound/soc/codecs/max98927.c
@@ -879,14 +879,14 @@ static int max98927_i2c_probe(struct i2c_client *i2c)
i2c_set_clientdata(i2c, max98927);
/* update interleave mode info */
- if (!of_property_read_u32(i2c->dev.of_node,
- "interleave_mode", &value)) {
- if (value > 0)
- max98927->interleave_mode = true;
- else
- max98927->interleave_mode = false;
- } else
- max98927->interleave_mode = false;
+ if (of_property_read_bool(i2c->dev.of_node, "maxim,interleave-mode")) {
+ max98927->interleave_mode = true;
+ } else {
+ if (!of_property_read_u32(i2c->dev.of_node, "interleave_mode",
+ &value))
+ if (value > 0)
+ max98927->interleave_mode = true;
+ }
/* regmap initialization */
max98927->regmap
--
2.34.1
