On Fri, Jul 21, 2023 at 12:58:14PM +0200, Takashi Iwai wrote: > On Fri, 21 Jul 2023 12:42:08 +0200, > Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > On Fri, Jul 21, 2023 at 12:08:46PM +0200, Takashi Iwai wrote: > > > On Fri, 21 Jul 2023 12:01:46 +0200, > > > Andy Shevchenko wrote: ... > > > While I see the benefit, I feel this is very confusing. If we use the > > > API for a generic use, it should be renamed at first. > > Any suggestion for the name? > > It's a universal pointer... uniptr_t? > Or a generic pointer, genptr_t? > > I'm not good at naming, and I'm open for it. It seems it's already spread enough with this name, I would rather stick with it for now (besides net it's used in crypto, nvme, and security). The (new) callback though makes a lot of sense on its own. What do you think? -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko
