On Thu, Jul 13, 2023 at 12:24:28PM +0200, Takashi Iwai wrote:
Well, I took your patch 3 just because you wanted to have a protection
of your data from both get/put callback and from another code path in
another patch. It was an (ab)use of controls->rwsem that couldn't be
accepted, so the patch 3 was taken as an alternative.
If this isn't the scenario, let me know: I'd rather drop the patch
again, as it's superfluous.
ok, then please drop it.
you're quite right that this is the scenario, but i can do that
selectively just as well, like it already is the case in some other
callbacks. i just wanted to have this patch first if it was to be
applied at all, because it seemed cleaner.
regards
