On Tue, Jul 11, 2023 at 04:09:42PM +0200, Amadeusz Sławiński wrote: > On 7/11/2023 4:00 PM, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > On Tue, Jul 11, 2023 at 02:57:20PM +0200, Amadeusz Sławiński wrote: ... > > > - .device = 0x119a, > > > + .device = PCI_DEVICE_ID_INTEL_ADSP_TNG, > > > > Yeah, somebody familiar with Intel history of SST/HDA/wtf should really > > tell why HDA code is using this ID. Does it mean that SST implies HDA > > always? Only for this (or this family of) platform? > > > > It might affect the ID naming, but otherwise it's orthogonal to the series. > > > > There were few early devices where DSP was separate unit: > Haswell, Broadwell - where we use ACPI to load (SND_SOC_INTEL_CATPT) audio > driver, Tangier/Merrifield - where ACPI or PCI is used to load > (SND_SST_ATOM_HIFI2_PLATFORM_PCI) audio driver. > All further generations are HDA devices with integrated DSP. This causes all > the weirdness ;) Maybe we should stick with SST in the name? At least that's how Tangier TRM titles it. -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko
