Hi Andreas, On Thu, Jul 6, 2023 at 9:34 AM Andreas Henriksson <andreas@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > I think your initial review comment was spot on Fabio. There probably > needs to be a(n imx8mm) specific flag that says when this workaround > should be applied and gate the code in bclk function on that. > Atleast that's the only thing I can think of if my interpretation of the > problem for imx8mm is correct. Yes, deciding whether MCLK_EN should act as a clock gate based on the number of SAI registers seems fragile to me. I have sent a proposal as RFC. Please give it a try if you have a chance. I would like Shengjiu to confirm if imx8mn and imx93 should also behave like imx8mm in this aspect. Cheers
