Mark Brown wrote: > On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 09:38:19PM +0800, Eric Miao wrote: >> Mark Brown wrote: > >>> I've queued this for Takashi, thanks (he's on holiday this week). I >>> had thought that at least the second hunk was already fixed but it seems >>> not. > >> This probably should go through the arm tree, along with other >> poodle patches, otherwise it just creates headache for Russell >> in the next merge. > > Avoiding headaches for Russell was part of the goal here - ASoC is > currently undergoing some fairly invasive renovations which increase the > chances of conflicts being introduced with changes done to sound/soc > outside that. > > This patch is in sound/soc only so it can't directly conflict with the > arch/arm changes that Russell is or will be carrying. > Oh, I've mistaken it with the poodle.c in arch/arm/mach-pxa. >> As if should go into 2.6.27, I don't know. Depending on if it >> qualifies to be a fix or just a clean-up, from ALSA's point of >> view. > > Currently it fails to build, partially fixed by this patch, so it's > not just coding style. Right, and I was just wondering why those "snd_*_t" still exists. _______________________________________________ Alsa-devel mailing list Alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel
