Re: [PATCH] Clean up ASOC functions to support 32b values instead of 16b

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 6:36 PM, Jon Smirl <jonsmirl@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> +int snd_soc_update_bits(struct snd_soc_codec *codec, uint reg,
> +                               uint mask, uint value);
> +int snd_soc_test_bits(struct snd_soc_codec *codec, uint reg,
> +                               uint mask, uint value);

Please use "unsigned int" instead of "uint".


> -       short reg_cache_size;
> -       short reg_cache_step;
> +       uint reg_cache_size;
> +       uint reg_cache_step;

size_t?

>  struct soc_enum {
> -       unsigned short reg;
> -       unsigned short reg2;
> -       unsigned char shift_l;
> -       unsigned char shift_r;
> -       unsigned int max;
> +       uint reg;
> +       uint reg2;
> +       uint shift_l;
> +       uint shift_r;
> +       uint max;

In this case, 'max' was already the right size.  You're now mixing the
real types with abbreviated ones, and so it's inconsistent.

-- 
Timur Tabi
Linux kernel developer at Freescale
_______________________________________________
Alsa-devel mailing list
Alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel

[Index of Archives]     [ALSA User]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Kernel Archive]     [Asterisk PBX]     [Photo Sharing]     [Linux Sound]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux