On Mon, 15 May 2023 13:19:29 +0200,
Amadeusz Sławiński wrote:
>
> On 5/12/2023 2:24 PM, Takashi Iwai wrote:
> > On Fri, 12 May 2023 14:00:54 +0200,
> > Amadeusz Sławiński wrote:
> >>
> >> On 5/12/2023 1:33 PM, Takashi Iwai wrote:
> >>> On Fri, 12 May 2023 13:23:49 +0200,
> >>> Takashi Iwai wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> On Thu, 11 May 2023 19:20:17 +0200,
> >>>> Amadeusz Sławiński wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On 5/11/2023 5:58 PM, Takashi Iwai wrote:
> >>>>>> On Thu, 11 May 2023 17:31:37 +0200,
> >>>>>> Amadeusz Sławiński wrote:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> On 5/10/2023 2:21 PM, Takashi Iwai wrote:
> >>>>>>>> On Tue, 09 May 2023 12:10:06 +0200,
> >>>>>>>> Amadeusz Sławiński wrote:
> >>>>>>> Then capture stream starts and seems to assume that
> >>>>>>> registers were already set, so it doesn't write them to hw.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> ... it seems this didn't happen, and that's the inconsistency.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> So the further question is:
> >>>>>> At the point just before you start recording, is the codec in runtime
> >>>>>> suspended? Or it's running?
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> If it's runtime-suspended, snd_hda_regmap_sync() must be called from
> >>>>>> alc269_resume() via runtime-resume, and this must write out the
> >>>>>> cached values. Then the bug can be along with that line.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Or if it's running, it means that the previous check of
> >>>>>> snd_hdac_keep_power_up() was bogus (or racy).
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Well, it is in... let's call it semi powered state. When snd_hda_intel
> >>>>> driver is loaded with power_save=X option it sets timeout to X seconds
> >>>>> and problem only happens when I start the stream before those X
> >>>>> seconds pass and it runs first runtime suspend. After it suspends it
> >>>>> then uses standard pm_runtime_resume and works correctly. That's why
> >>>>> the pm_runtime_force_suspend(&codec->core.dev); mentioned in first
> >>>>> email in thread "fixes" the problem, as it forces it to be instantly
> >>>>> suspended instead of waiting for timeout and then later normal
> >>>>> resume-play/record-suspend flow can be followed.
> >>>>
> >>>> Hm, then maybe it's a bad idea to rely on the usage count there.
> >>>> Even if the usage is 0, the device can be still active, and the update
> >>>> can be missed.
> >>>>
> >>>> How about the patch like below?
> >>>
> >>> Scratch that, it returns a wrong value.
> >>> A simpler version like below works instead?
> >>>
> >>
> >> Yes it was broken, arecord didn't even start capturing ;)
> >>
> >>>
> >>> Takashi
> >>>
> >>> --- a/sound/hda/hdac_device.c
> >>> +++ b/sound/hda/hdac_device.c
> >>> @@ -611,10 +611,9 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(snd_hdac_power_up_pm);
> >>> int snd_hdac_keep_power_up(struct hdac_device *codec)
> >>> {
> >>> if (!atomic_inc_not_zero(&codec->in_pm)) {
> >>> - int ret = pm_runtime_get_if_in_use(&codec->dev);
> >>> - if (!ret)
> >>> + if (!pm_runtime_active(&codec->dev))
> >>> return -1;
> >>> - if (ret < 0)
> >>> + if (pm_runtime_get_sync(&codec->dev) < 0)
> >>> return 0;
> >>> }
> >>> return 1;
> >>
> >>
> >> This one seems to work, as in I'm able to record before first suspend
> >> hits. However device stays in D0 when no stream is running...
> >> # cat /sys/devices/pci0000\:00/0000\:00\:0e.0/power_state
> >> D0
> >
> > OK, one step forward. The previous change was bad in anyway, as we
> > shouldn't sync there at all.
> >
> > So, the problem becomes clearer now: it's in the lazy update mechanism
> > that misses the case that has to be written.
> >
> > Scratch the previous one again, and could you try the following one
> > instead?
> >
> >
> > Takashi
> >
> > --- a/sound/hda/hdac_regmap.c
> > +++ b/sound/hda/hdac_regmap.c
> > @@ -293,8 +293,17 @@ static int hda_reg_write(void *context, unsigned int reg, unsigned int val)
> > if (verb != AC_VERB_SET_POWER_STATE) {
> > pm_lock = codec_pm_lock(codec);
> > - if (pm_lock < 0)
> > - return codec->lazy_cache ? 0 : -EAGAIN;
> > + if (pm_lock < 0) {
> > + /* skip the actual write if it's in lazy-update mode
> > + * and only if the device is actually suspended;
> > + * the usage count can be zero at transition phase
> > + * (either suspending/resuming or auto-suspend sleep)
> > + */
> > + if (codec->lazy_cache &&
> > + pm_runtime_suspended(&codec->dev))
> > + return 0;
> > + return -EAGAIN;
> > + }
> > }
> > if (is_stereo_amp_verb(reg)) {
> >
>
> With this one we are back to same behavior as without it. When capture
> is started before first suspend it records silence. After waiting for
> timeout and suspend it records correctly.
Hm, interesting. Does it mean that the pm_runtime_get_if_in_use() (in
snd_hdac_keep_power_up()) returns a non-zero value?
Or is pm_runtime_suspended() returns really true there?
Takashi
