On 11/05/2023 15:19, Ding, Shenghao wrote: > > On 11/05/2023 07:49, Mark Brown wrote: >>> Missing minItems, but... >> >>>> + items: >>>> + minimum: 0x38 >>>> + maximum: 0x3f >> >>> ... So these are fixed? No need to encode them in such case... >> >> I'm not sure I understand your concern here, there's up to 4 possible >> values from 0x38-0x3f which has more than 4 possible values. > > Aren't the addresses going to be incremented by one (up to 8 of devices in total)? With your style of replies, it looks like you wrote it... > > No, the i2c address order is not always monotonic increase or decrease, sometime it would be disorder, according to the application. > Each device would have eight possible i2c address, the final address depends on the hardware connections. OK, the question about the broadcast is still there - cannot it be deduced? Best regards, Krzysztof
