On 10/05/2023 09:33, Martin Povišer wrote: > >> On 10. 5. 2023, at 9:30, Martin Povišer <povik+lin@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >>> On 10. 5. 2023, at 9:17, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> >>> On 09/05/2023 17:34, Martin Povišer wrote: >>>> A bunch of TI's codecs have binding schemas which force #sound-dai-cells >>>> to one despite those codecs only having a single DAI. Allow for bindings >>>> with zero DAI cells and deprecate the former non-zero value. >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Martin Povišer <povik+lin@xxxxxxxxxxx> >>>> --- > >>>> '#sound-dai-cells': >>>> - const: 1 >>>> + # The codec has a single DAI, the #sound-dai-cells=<1>; case is left in for backward >>>> + # compatibility but is deprecated. >>>> + enum: [0, 1] >>> >>> Does it? I see playback and capture. >> >> I think so. Playback and capture are not separate DAIs. >> >> Martin > > I double checked, I am pretty sure. There’s a single snd_soc_dai_driver, > which becomes a single DAI. Indeed, I see now one entry... Ehh... -ENOTENOUGHCOFFEE Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxx> Best regards, Krzysztof
