On Fri, 05 May 2023 12:31:35 +0200, Oswald Buddenhagen wrote: > > From: Jaroslav Kysela <perex@xxxxxxxx> > > The snd_pcm_playback_hw_avail() function uses runtime->status->hw_ptr. > Unfortunately, in case when we call this function from snd_pcm_update_hw_ptr0(), > this variable contains the previous hardware pointer. Use the new_hw_ptr > argument to calculate hw_avail (filled samples by the user space) to > correct the threshold comparison. > > The new_hw_ptr argument may also be set to ULONG_MAX which means the > initialization phase. In this case, use runtime->status->hw_ptr. > > Suggested-by: Oswald Buddenhagen <oswald.buddenhagen@xxxxxx> > Signed-off-by: Jaroslav Kysela <perex@xxxxxxxx> > Reviewed-by: Oswald Buddenhagen <oswald.buddenhagen@xxxxxx> Here misses your Signed-off-by tag. Ditto for the patch 3. It's a legal requirement, and I can't apply patches without it. Could you resubmit the series quickly with your SOB? thanks, Takashi
