On Sun, Apr 16, 2023 at 2:29 PM Christophe JAILLET <
christophe.jaillet@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> dev_err_probe() already display the error code. There is no need to
> duplicate it explicitly in the error message.
>
> Signed-off-by: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
Acked-by: Shengjiu Wang <shengjiu.wang@xxxxxxxxx>
Best regards
wang shengjiu
> ---
> sound/soc/fsl/fsl-asoc-card.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/sound/soc/fsl/fsl-asoc-card.c b/sound/soc/fsl/fsl-asoc-card.c
> index bffa1048d31e..40870668ee24 100644
> --- a/sound/soc/fsl/fsl-asoc-card.c
> +++ b/sound/soc/fsl/fsl-asoc-card.c
> @@ -858,7 +858,7 @@ static int fsl_asoc_card_probe(struct platform_device
> *pdev)
>
> ret = devm_snd_soc_register_card(&pdev->dev, &priv->card);
> if (ret) {
> - dev_err_probe(&pdev->dev, ret, "snd_soc_register_card
> failed: %d\n", ret);
> + dev_err_probe(&pdev->dev, ret, "snd_soc_register_card
> failed\n");
> goto asrc_fail;
> }
>
> --
> 2.34.1
>
>
