On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 02:45:19PM +0200, Takashi Iwai wrote: > With this patch, dapm_update_bits() is called even when > power_change=0, so it changes the behavior. You can check > power_change only once and skip the rest via continue if it's false. Fixed - dapm_update_bits() already suppresses duplicate writes. > Also, better to put parentheses around bit-and operation. Fixed. As with some other things it might be worth adding checks you want like this to checkpatch. > Anyway, if the indent level really matters, you should better to put > it as a function. The new indentation level is fine - the major issue was that the old layout was over 80 columns already (checkpatch!), plus the way it was structured would lead to exploding nesting levels when new cases were added. Splitting it out would only move it away from the handling of other widgets which wouldn't help so much. I'll resubmit shortly. _______________________________________________ Alsa-devel mailing list Alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel
