Re: [bug report] ASoC: SOF: avoid a NULL dereference with unsupported widgets

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Apr 03, 2023 at 08:20:38AM +0300, Péter Ujfalusi wrote:
> 
> 
> On 01/04/2023 10:44, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 31, 2023 at 10:14:11AM +0300, Péter Ujfalusi wrote:
> >> if src_fw_module is NULL then the print will be:
> >> source (efault) or sink sink.module.name widget weren't set up properly
> >>
> >> Guennadi is relying on some black magic in the printk system to handle
> >> the printing instead of open coding.
> > 
> > I've done compiler related work and explored some weird aspect of the
> > C language and I am so fascinated by this.  I would have thought it
> > crashes before the function is called.  I cannot even imagine how black
> > magic like this would work.
> 
> I think it is not a compiler magic, but kernel magic:
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/lib/vsprintf.c#n700
> 
> > Is there anyway I can test this?
> 
> You could, If you have a laptop which uses SOF and it is Intel 11th gen
> or newer then you can switch it to IPC4 and install the opt-in v2.5
> (which would need with 6.4 kernel).
> Apply this patch to 6.3-rc (or 6.2) and boot up, but unpatched kernel
> will NULL dereference, so you need to have a backup option.
> 
> https://github.com/thesofproject/sof-bin
> 
> The v2.5 is not there as a release,you need to fetch the repo and follow
> the instructions.
> 
> Read the instruction in v2.5.x/README.md before attempting to use this
> release.
> 
> Now that I look back at the patch, yes it is not obvious, but it is
> doing a valid thing.

Yeah.  Fine.  It doesn't crash but "valid" is kind of debatable.  It's
a super ugly thing.

regards,
dan carpenter




[Index of Archives]     [ALSA User]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Pulse Audio]     [Kernel Archive]     [Asterisk PBX]     [Photo Sharing]     [Linux Sound]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux