On Wed, Mar 15, 2023 at 05:23:23PM +0000, Mark Brown wrote: > On Wed, Mar 15, 2023 at 04:04:52PM +0100, Uwe Kleine-König wrote: > > Hello, > > > > this series adapts the platform drivers below sound/ to use the .remove_new() > > callback. Compared to the traditional .remove() callback .remove_new() returns > > no value. This is a good thing because the driver core doesn't (and cannot) > > cope for errors during remove. The only effect of a non-zero return value in > > .remove() is that the driver core emits a warning. The device is removed anyhow > > and an early return from .remove() usually yields a resource leak. > > ALSA and ASoC patches generally get applied to separate trees so it's > probably better to send them separately unless there's dependencies. OK, I should have considered that giving that the subject prefixes are also different, sorry. I hope to remember that for the next quest. I won't resend this series split in two for this development cycle but address this for the next merge window, taking into account patches that were applied despite your hint. As things stand now that would be for ALSA: b4 am -l -t -P1,3-12,172-173 20230315150745.67084-1-u.kleine-koenig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx and for ASoC: b4 am -l -t -P2,13-119,121-171 20230315150745.67084-1-u.kleine-koenig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx Oh, but I see Takashi suggested to take them all via ASoC, in this case just skip patch 120. Best regards Uwe -- Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-König | Industrial Linux Solutions | https://www.pengutronix.de/ |
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
