On Mon, 13 Mar 2023 01:49:24 +0100, Kuninori Morimoto wrote: > > control_message() might be called with pao = NULL. > Here indicates control_message() as sample. > > (B) static void control_message(struct hpi_adapter_obj *pao, ...) > { ^^^ > struct hpi_hw_obj *phw = pao->priv; > ... ^^^ > } > > (A) void _HPI_6205(struct hpi_adapter_obj *pao, ...) > { ^^^ > ... > case HPI_OBJ_CONTROL: > (B) control_message(pao, phm, phr); > break; ^^^ > ... > } > > void HPI_6205(...) > { > ... > (A) _HPI_6205(NULL, phm, phr); > ... ^^^^ > } > > Therefore, We will get too many warning via cppcheck, like below > > sound/pci/asihpi/hpi6205.c:238:27: warning: Possible null pointer dereference: pao [nullPointer] > struct hpi_hw_obj *phw = pao->priv; > ^ > sound/pci/asihpi/hpi6205.c:433:13: note: Calling function '_HPI_6205', 1st argument 'NULL' value is 0 > _HPI_6205(NULL, phm, phr); > ^ > sound/pci/asihpi/hpi6205.c:401:20: note: Calling function 'control_message', 1st argument 'pao' value is 0 > control_message(pao, phm, phr); > ^ > Set phr->error like many functions doing, and don't call _HPI_6205() > with NULL. > > Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@xxxxxxxxxxx> Thanks, applied. Takashi