On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 05:52:50PM +0200, Takashi Iwai wrote: > At Wed, 9 Jul 2008 20:31:38 +0200, > Thomas Bogendoerfer wrote: > > > > On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 02:15:26AM +0200, Takashi Iwai wrote: > > > At Wed, 9 Jul 2008 19:50:59 +0200, > > > > > If there are shared interrupts, they could be called before the > > > > > initialization below. So, safer to move after the init. > > > > > > > > they can't be shared and it's already done before any hardware init. > > > > > > Then any reason to pass IRQF_SHARED? > > > > of course not. I'll remove it. > > v2 still has it... I know, I've sent it earlier. Just wanted to give v2 a little time, if something else pops up. If everything else is ok, I'll respin a v3 with just the IRQF_SHARED removed. Thomas. -- Crap can work. Given enough thrust pigs will fly, but it's not necessary a good idea. [ RFC1925, 2.3 ] _______________________________________________ Alsa-devel mailing list Alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel
