On 27/02/23 22:05, Pierre-Louis Bossart wrote:
>
> On 2/27/23 10:47, Vijendar Mukunda wrote:
>> AMD ACP(v6.x) IP block has two SoundWire manager devices.
>> Add support for
>> - Manager driver probe & remove sequence
>> - Helper functions to enable/disable interrupts,
>> Initialize sdw manager, enable sdw pads
>> - Manager driver sdw_master_ops & port_ops callbacks
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Vijendar Mukunda <Vijendar.Mukunda@xxxxxxx>
>> ---
>> drivers/soundwire/amd_manager.c | 749 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> drivers/soundwire/amd_manager.h | 252 ++++++++++
>> include/linux/soundwire/sdw_amd.h | 67 +++
>> 3 files changed, 1068 insertions(+)
>> create mode 100644 drivers/soundwire/amd_manager.c
>> create mode 100644 drivers/soundwire/amd_manager.h
>> create mode 100644 include/linux/soundwire/sdw_amd.h
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/soundwire/amd_manager.c b/drivers/soundwire/amd_manager.c
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 000000000000..63cd8d066602
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/drivers/soundwire/amd_manager.c
>> @@ -0,0 +1,749 @@
>> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0+
>> +/*
>> + * SoundWire AMD Manager driver
>> + *
>> + * Copyright 2023 Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
>> + */
>> +
>> +#include <linux/completion.h>
>> +#include <linux/device.h>
>> +#include <linux/io.h>
>> +#include <linux/jiffies.h>
>> +#include <linux/kernel.h>
>> +#include <linux/module.h>
>> +#include <linux/slab.h>
>> +#include <linux/soundwire/sdw.h>
>> +#include <linux/soundwire/sdw_registers.h>
>> +#include <linux/wait.h>
>> +#include <sound/pcm_params.h>
>> +#include <sound/soc.h>
>> +#include "bus.h"
>> +#include "amd_manager.h"
>> +
>> +#define DRV_NAME "amd_sdw_manager"
>> +
>> +#define to_amd_sdw(b) container_of(b, struct amd_sdw_manager, bus)
>> +
>> +static void amd_enable_sdw_pads(struct amd_sdw_manager *amd_manager)
>> +{
>> + u32 sw_pad_pulldown_val;
>> + u32 val;
>> +
>> + mutex_lock(amd_manager->acp_sdw_lock);
>> + val = acp_reg_readl(amd_manager->acp_mmio + ACP_SW_PAD_KEEPER_EN);
>> + val |= amd_manager->reg_mask->sw_pad_enable_mask;
>> + acp_reg_writel(val, amd_manager->acp_mmio + ACP_SW_PAD_KEEPER_EN);
>> + usleep_range(1000, 1500);
>> +
>> + sw_pad_pulldown_val = acp_reg_readl(amd_manager->acp_mmio + ACP_PAD_PULLDOWN_CTRL);
>> + sw_pad_pulldown_val &= amd_manager->reg_mask->sw_pad_pulldown_mask;
>> + acp_reg_writel(sw_pad_pulldown_val, amd_manager->acp_mmio + ACP_PAD_PULLDOWN_CTRL);
>> + mutex_unlock(amd_manager->acp_sdw_lock);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int amd_init_sdw_manager(struct amd_sdw_manager *amd_manager)
>> +{
>> + u32 val;
>> + u32 timeout = 0;
>> + u32 retry_count = 0;
>> +
>> + acp_reg_writel(AMD_SDW_ENABLE, amd_manager->mmio + ACP_SW_EN);
>> + do {
>> + val = acp_reg_readl(amd_manager->mmio + ACP_SW_EN_STATUS);
>> + if (val)
>> + break;
>> + usleep_range(10, 20);
>> + } while (retry_count++ < AMD_SDW_STAT_MAX_RETRY_COUNT);
>> +
>> + if (retry_count > AMD_SDW_STAT_MAX_RETRY_COUNT)
>> + return -ETIMEDOUT;
>> +
>> + /* SoundWire manager bus reset */
>> + acp_reg_writel(AMD_SDW_BUS_RESET_REQ, amd_manager->mmio + ACP_SW_BUS_RESET_CTRL);
>> + val = acp_reg_readl(amd_manager->mmio + ACP_SW_BUS_RESET_CTRL);
>> + while (!(val & AMD_SDW_BUS_RESET_DONE)) {
>> + val = acp_reg_readl(amd_manager->mmio + ACP_SW_BUS_RESET_CTRL);
>> + if (timeout > AMD_DELAY_LOOP_ITERATION)
>> + break;
>> + usleep_range(1, 5);
>> + timeout++;
>> + }
>> + if (timeout > AMD_DELAY_LOOP_ITERATION)
>> + return -ETIMEDOUT;
> nit-pick: add a new line here since you're starting a different sequence.
>
will fix it.
>> + timeout = 0;
>> + acp_reg_writel(AMD_SDW_BUS_RESET_CLEAR_REQ, amd_manager->mmio + ACP_SW_BUS_RESET_CTRL);
>> + val = acp_reg_readl(amd_manager->mmio + ACP_SW_BUS_RESET_CTRL);
>> + while (val) {
>> + val = acp_reg_readl(amd_manager->mmio + ACP_SW_BUS_RESET_CTRL);
>> + if (timeout > AMD_DELAY_LOOP_ITERATION)
>> + break;
>> + usleep_range(1, 5);
>> + timeout++;
>> + }
>> + if (timeout > AMD_DELAY_LOOP_ITERATION) {
>> + dev_err(amd_manager->dev, "Failed to reset SoundWire manager instance%d\n",
>> + amd_manager->instance);
>> + return -ETIMEDOUT;
>> + }
> and same here, this is a new sequence starting here so a newline would help
will fix it.
>> + retry_count = 0;
>> + acp_reg_writel(AMD_SDW_DISABLE, amd_manager->mmio + ACP_SW_EN);
>> + do {
>> + val = acp_reg_readl(amd_manager->mmio + ACP_SW_EN_STATUS);
>> + if (!val)
>> + break;
>> + usleep_range(10, 20);
>> + } while (retry_count++ < AMD_SDW_STAT_MAX_RETRY_COUNT);
>> +
>> + if (retry_count > AMD_SDW_STAT_MAX_RETRY_COUNT)
>> + return -ETIMEDOUT;
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int amd_enable_sdw_manager(struct amd_sdw_manager *amd_manager)
>> +{
>> + u32 val;
>> + u32 retry_count = 0;
>> +
>> + acp_reg_writel(AMD_SDW_ENABLE, amd_manager->mmio + ACP_SW_EN);
>> + do {
>> + val = acp_reg_readl(amd_manager->mmio + ACP_SW_EN_STATUS);
>> + if (val)
>> + break;
>> + usleep_range(10, 20);
>> + } while (retry_count++ < AMD_SDW_STAT_MAX_RETRY_COUNT);
>> +
>> + if (retry_count > AMD_SDW_STAT_MAX_RETRY_COUNT)
>> + return -ETIMEDOUT;
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +static void amd_sdw_ctl_word_prep(u32 *low_word, u32 *high_word, u32 cmd_type,
>> + struct sdw_msg *msg, int cmd_offset)
>> +{
>> + u32 low_data = 0, high_data;
>> + u16 addr;
>> + u8 addr_high, addr_low;
>> + u8 data = 0;
> nit-pick: this looks a bit messy, usually it's simpler to have
> initialized variables on separate lines. If you keep the low and high on
> the same line, then at least use the same order.
will fix it.
>> +
>> + addr = msg->addr + cmd_offset;
>> + addr_high = (addr & 0xFF00) >> 8;
>> + addr_low = addr & 0xFF;
>> +
>> + if (cmd_type == AMD_SDW_CMD_WRITE)
>> + data = msg->buf[cmd_offset];
>> +
>> + high_data = FIELD_PREP(AMD_SDW_MCP_CMD_DEV_ADDR, msg->dev_num);
>> + high_data |= FIELD_PREP(AMD_SDW_MCP_CMD_COMMAND, cmd_type);
>> + high_data |= FIELD_PREP(AMD_SDW_MCP_CMD_REG_ADDR_HIGH, addr_high);
>> + low_data |= FIELD_PREP(AMD_SDW_MCP_CMD_REG_ADDR_LOW, addr_low);
>> + low_data |= FIELD_PREP(AMD_SDW_MCP_CMD_REG_DATA, data);
>> +
>> + *high_word = high_data;
>> + *low_word = low_data;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static u64 amd_sdw_send_cmd_get_resp(struct amd_sdw_manager *amd_manager, u32 lword, u32 uword)
>> +{
>> + u64 resp;
>> + u32 resp_lower, resp_high;
> nit-pick: resp_low? you seem to use this low/high pattern in a number of
> places.
will fix it.
>> + u32 sts;
>> + u32 timeout = 0;
>> +
>> + sts = acp_reg_readl(amd_manager->mmio + ACP_SW_IMM_CMD_STS);
>> + while (sts & AMD_SDW_IMM_CMD_BUSY) {
>> + if (timeout++ > AMD_SDW_RETRY_COUNT) {
>> + dev_err(amd_manager->dev, "SDW%x previous cmd status clear failed\n",
>> + amd_manager->instance);
>> + return -ETIMEDOUT;
>> + }
>> + usleep_range(5, 10);
>> + sts = acp_reg_readl(amd_manager->mmio + ACP_SW_IMM_CMD_STS);
>> + }
>> +
>> + timeout = 0;
>> + if (sts & AMD_SDW_IMM_RES_VALID) {
>> + dev_err(amd_manager->dev, "SDW%x manager is in bad state\n", amd_manager->instance);
>> + acp_reg_writel(0x00, amd_manager->mmio + ACP_SW_IMM_CMD_STS);
>> + }
>> + acp_reg_writel(uword, amd_manager->mmio + ACP_SW_IMM_CMD_UPPER_WORD);
>> + acp_reg_writel(lword, amd_manager->mmio + ACP_SW_IMM_CMD_LOWER_QWORD);
>> +
>> + sts = acp_reg_readl(amd_manager->mmio + ACP_SW_IMM_CMD_STS);
>> + while (!(sts & AMD_SDW_IMM_RES_VALID)) {
>> + if (timeout++ > AMD_SDW_RETRY_COUNT) {
>> + dev_err(amd_manager->dev, "SDW%x cmd response timeout occurred\n",
>> + amd_manager->instance);
>> + return -ETIMEDOUT;
>> + }
>> + usleep_range(5, 10);
>> + sts = acp_reg_readl(amd_manager->mmio + ACP_SW_IMM_CMD_STS);
>> + }
>> + resp_high = acp_reg_readl(amd_manager->mmio + ACP_SW_IMM_RESP_UPPER_WORD);
>> + resp_lower = acp_reg_readl(amd_manager->mmio + ACP_SW_IMM_RESP_LOWER_QWORD);
> nit-pick: newline here.
will fix it.
>> + timeout = 0;
>> + acp_reg_writel(AMD_SDW_IMM_RES_VALID, amd_manager->mmio + ACP_SW_IMM_CMD_STS);
>> + sts = acp_reg_readl(amd_manager->mmio + ACP_SW_IMM_CMD_STS);
>> + while ((sts & AMD_SDW_IMM_RES_VALID)) {
>> + if (timeout++ > AMD_SDW_RETRY_COUNT) {
>> + dev_err(amd_manager->dev, "SDW%x cmd status retry failed\n",
>> + amd_manager->instance);
>> + return -ETIMEDOUT;
>> + }
>> + usleep_range(5, 10);
>> + sts = acp_reg_readl(amd_manager->mmio + ACP_SW_IMM_CMD_STS);
>> + }
>> + resp = resp_high;
>> + resp = (resp << 32) | resp_lower;
>> + return resp;
>> +}
>> +static unsigned int _amd_sdw_xfer_msg(struct amd_sdw_manager *amd_manager, struct sdw_msg *msg,
>> + int cmd, int cmd_offset)
>> +{
>> + u64 response;
>> + u32 uword = 0, lword = 0;
> couldn't figure out what uword and lword refer to. Is this high/low as
> above or something else?
its high and low. Register naming convention uses
upper word and lower word. will use naming convention
throughout the code.
>> +
>> + amd_sdw_ctl_word_prep(&lword, &uword, cmd, msg, cmd_offset);
>> + response = amd_sdw_send_cmd_get_resp(amd_manager, lword, uword);
>> + return amd_sdw_fill_msg_resp(amd_manager, msg, response, cmd_offset);
>> +}
