At Thu, 03 Jul 2008 12:42:00 +0200, Rene Herman wrote: > > On 03-07-08 12:07, Takashi Iwai wrote: > > > At Tue, 1 Jul 2008 20:14:11 +0200, > > Krzysztof Helt wrote: > > >> --- > >> Another step toward unification of all WSS compatible > >> chips handling. > > > > Right, and without the unification, these patches have little merits. > > So far, it's more addition than deletion in total. > > [Your work is greatly appreciated, of course. I just want to tell > > that it can't be applied alone without the unification.] > > Yes these should probably grow as a series with somewhat of a (semi-) > final result being apparent after applying patch N of N. I'm importing > Krzysztof' patches into a "wss" branch in my local git tree and will be > testing them as they come in though -- and frankly, I think it's better > if they come in as he does them a few at a time rather than a large > number at once as it's easier for review purposes. Well, I can keep it in a branch if you prefer. Just let me know. > (by the way, Krzysztof, if them not being applied immediately anyway > means you'd rather work the series against for example current mainline > that's fine by me as well) > > > BTW, the first patch seems too big for ML, and it can't be applied as > > is (wss.h doesn't exist, etc), in addition to missing Kconfig and > > Makefile changes. Could you fix and split to several patches? > > They depended on his first two patches: > > http://mailman.alsa-project.org/pipermail/alsa-devel/2008-June/008766.html > http://mailman.alsa-project.org/pipermail/alsa-devel/2008-June/008669.html > > But as far as I'm concerned you could just sit back until the series is > somewhat "complete". OK. As 2.6.26 will come out soon, it's a bit too late to include such a big change for 2.6.27. So we have still some time :) thanks, Takashi _______________________________________________ Alsa-devel mailing list Alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel
