On Fri, Jan 20, 2023, at 13:07, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 20, 2023 at 10:05:59AM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>
>> I see, this patch still depends on the s3c24xx removal, which
>> is in soc/for-next and I used for testing. I see a similar
>> problem with the MMP platform in patch 2/5. The series here
>> is mostly older patches I did a while ago and rebased on top
>> of the boardfile removal, but it breaks when it gets applied
>> first.
>
>> Unless there is anything in here that you really want to apply
>> for 6.3, lets drop all five for now, and I'll resend it
>> after the dust has settled on the boardfile removal.
>
> I'd left the ux500 stuff running through my testing, no
> particular urgency just it saves rereviewing anything. Assuming
> it's fine (seems so thus far) I'll push it out.
Yes, sounds good to me, I don't see any risk of missed
dependencies for that.
Arnd
