On Fri, Jan 13, 2023 at 11:32 AM Jaroslav Kysela <perex@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On 13. 01. 23 19:50, cujomalainey@xxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > > From: Curtis Malainey <cujomalainey@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > Right now in snd_use_case_geti you cannot tell if the item being queried > > exists or not when being checked. This also means the only way to check > > for the existence of something in the client of the library is to > > iterate over the list of mods/devs even if we know exactly the name we > > are looking for. We have functions that do exactly this internally so > > lets return this information in a logical fashion through geti. > > The device_status/modifier_status functions are used internally, too. > I would add the device validation only to the geti code. The other parts do > this job already and expect just 0 or 1 return values. > > Jaroslav Understood, I will move it back to geti directly, figured this was the cleanest place to put it but that makes sense if other places use those internal functions. > > -- > Jaroslav Kysela <perex@xxxxxxxx> > Linux Sound Maintainer; ALSA Project; Red Hat, Inc.
