On Mon, 09 Jan 2023 12:45:51 +0100, <yang.yang29@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > From: Xu Panda <xu.panda@xxxxxxxxxx> > > The implementation of strscpy() is more robust and safer. > That's now the recommended way to copy NUL-terminated strings. > > Signed-off-by: Xu Panda <xu.panda@xxxxxxxxxx> > Signed-off-by: Yang Yang <yang.yang29@xxxxxxxxxx> > --- > sound/core/control_led.c | 3 +-- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/sound/core/control_led.c b/sound/core/control_led.c > index f975cc85772b..c88653c205eb 100644 > --- a/sound/core/control_led.c > +++ b/sound/core/control_led.c > @@ -534,8 +534,7 @@ static ssize_t set_led_id(struct snd_ctl_led_card *led_card, const char *buf, si > struct snd_ctl_elem_id id; > int err; > > - strncpy(buf2, buf, len); > - buf2[len] = '\0'; > + strncpy(buf2, buf, len + 1); Still using strncpy()...? thanks, Takashi
