Re: [PATCH 14/14] Fixed the retry_cnt bug about being zero

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Jan 09, 2023 at 07:33:19AM +0000, Ki-Seok Jo wrote:
> 
> >On Fri, Jan 06, 2023 at 09:55:43AM +0000, Ki-Seok Jo wrote:
> > > 
> > > Hi Dan,
> > > 
> > > I'm sorry. There was an opinion that the pach sent last time was inconvenient to look at because the entire patch aws modified at once.
> > > 
> 
> > What you should have done was just fold everything into two patches:
> > patch 1: add the driver
> > patch 2: add the device tree bindings
> 
> > Instead you did:
> > patch 1: add the driver
> > patch 2: add the device tree bindings
> > patch 3: re-write all of patch 1.
> 
> > Re-writing everything is not allowed, but it's also not necessary.  And also it is against the rules to submit broken code and fix it later.
> 
> > It's a new driver so just fix patch 1 and resend that as a v2 patch.
> > Same for the stuff I mentioned in my bug report.
> 
> > https://staticthinking.wordpress.com/2022/07/27/how-to-send-a-v2-patch/
> 
> > regards,
> > dan carpenter
> 
> 
> Thank you for your kindly advise. I read your report and it was very helpful.
> As I understand, I already sent it the wrong way. So I want to pick up the pieces.
> 
> First, I already sent the new driver code a few months ago.
> After that, I got several feedbacks.
> I've edit and test it. So a lot of things changed at once.
> 
> Since I changed so many things, I didn't know what to do, so I just updated it as a patch.
> It's my mistake...
> 
> So I already sent about patch 1 and 2, if I get the feedback, should I send a lot of changes as v2 patch?(not patch 3)
> For each change, should I send patch log per commit?
> 
> Like that:
> Patch 1: add the driver
> Patch 2: add the device tree bindings
> 
> (instead patch 3)
> + Patch v2 1: change 1 about feedback1
> + Patch v2 2: change 2 about feedback1
> + ...
> + Patch v2 10: change 3 about feedback1
> 
> Is it right?

No.

> 
> Or should I revise it again and send it again from v2 patch 1?
> (It's not registered with the kernel source yet..)
> Patch v2 1: add the driver (applied the feedback)
> Patch v2 2: add the device tree bindings
> 

Yes.  Revise again and resend everything as two patches.

regards,
dan carpenter




[Index of Archives]     [ALSA User]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Pulse Audio]     [Kernel Archive]     [Asterisk PBX]     [Photo Sharing]     [Linux Sound]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux