Takashi Iwai wrote: > Well, let me clarify a bit more: if the patch should be *merged* to > 2.6.26 tree, this has to be noted somewhere. The text "the patch is > for 2.6.26" can be understood (as I did so indeed) like that "the > patch can be applied cleanly to 2.6.26". Hmmm. When I said, "this patch is for 2.6.26", I meant that the patch is for 2.6.26. I guess I'll be more explicit next time. -- Timur Tabi Linux kernel developer at Freescale _______________________________________________ Alsa-devel mailing list Alsa-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel
