> From: Weidong Wang <wangweidong.a@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Add a DT schema for describing Awinic AW883xx audio amplifiers. They are > controlled using I2C. > > Signed-off-by: Weidong Wang <wangweidong.a@xxxxxxxxxx> > --- > .../bindings/sound/awinic,aw883xx.yaml | 62 +++++++++++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 62 insertions(+) > create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sound/awinic,aw883xx.yaml > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sound/awinic,aw883xx.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sound/awinic,aw883xx.yaml > new file mode 100644 > index 000000000000..04cdcf25a6d4 > --- /dev/null > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sound/awinic,aw883xx.yaml > @@ -0,0 +1,62 @@ > +# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause) > +%YAML 1.2 > +--- > +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/sound/awinic,aw883xx.yaml# > +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml# > + > +title: Awinic AW883xx Smart Audio Amplifier > + > +maintainers: > + - Stephan Gerhold <stephan@xxxxxxxxxxx> > + > +description: > + The Awinic AW883XX is an I2S/TDM input, high efficiency > + digital Smart K audio amplifier with an integrated 10.25V > + smart boost convert. > + > +allOf: > + - $ref: name-prefix.yaml# > + > +properties: > + compatible: > + const: awinic,aw883xx_smartpa > + > + reg: > + description: > + The I2C address of the device for I2C > What happened here? This was not present before. Drop description. I will delete this description in patch v5 > + maxItems: 1 > + > + reset-gpios: > + description: > + Reset pin of aw883xx chip > The same case. Drop description. > I commented only for irq-gpios that they need description. I will delete this description in patch v5 > + maxItems: 1 > + > + sound-channel: > + description: > + Number of sound channels of the aw883xx chip > Your description does not explain me much. Number of supported sound > channels is usually fixed in the hardware, thus coming from compatible. > Therefore this might mean something else... but anyway your driver does > not use it really, so just drop it. I will delete this property node in patch v5 Thank you very much for your advice Best regards, Weidong Wang
