On Mon, Oct 31, 2022 at 01:43:43PM -0500, Rob Herring wrote: > On Fri, Oct 28, 2022 at 12:56:16PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote: > > If we're going to do this we should also allow the bindings to label the > > mics appropriately so that the control presented can reflect the actual > > hardware. It does feel like it might fit better to do this separately > > to the DMIC driver as a mux between the DMIC and the DAI it's connected > > to but equally with the way things are at the minute that feels like > > it's probably disproportionate effort. > Are there other needs for DAI muxes? We already have a mux binding, so > defining a DAI mux would work for any type of muxing control, not just > GPIO. I suspect that anything that is more complex than a GPIO should be a full fledged CODEC with the muxing internal to the CODEC and just described that way.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
