When a component has a prefix, and uses a SND_SOC_DAPM_REGULATOR_SUPPLY,
the name of the regulator should not use the prefix, otherwise it won't
be properly matched in the DT/ACPI.
Fixes: 3caac759681e ("ASoC: soc-dapm.c: fixup snd_soc_dapm_new_control_unlocked() error handling")
Signed-off-by: Paul Cercueil <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
sound/soc/soc-dapm.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/sound/soc/soc-dapm.c b/sound/soc/soc-dapm.c
index d515e7a78ea8..879cf1be67a9 100644
--- a/sound/soc/soc-dapm.c
+++ b/sound/soc/soc-dapm.c
@@ -3645,7 +3645,7 @@ snd_soc_dapm_new_control_unlocked(struct snd_soc_dapm_context *dapm,
switch (w->id) {
case snd_soc_dapm_regulator_supply:
- w->regulator = devm_regulator_get(dapm->dev, w->name);
+ w->regulator = devm_regulator_get(dapm->dev, widget->name);
if (IS_ERR(w->regulator)) {
ret = PTR_ERR(w->regulator);
goto request_failed;
--
2.35.1
