Re: [PATCH v2] ASoC: Intel: Skylake: fix possible memory leak in skl_codec_device_init()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2022-10-20 12:59 PM, Yang Yingliang wrote:
If snd_hdac_device_register() fails, 'codec' and name allocated in
dev_set_name() called in snd_hdac_device_init() are leaked. Fix this
by calling put_device(), so they can be freed in snd_hda_codec_dev_release()
and kobject_cleanup().

Fixes: e4746d94d00c ("ASoC: Intel: Skylake: Introduce HDA codec init and exit routines")
Fixes: dfe66a18780d ("ALSA: hdac_ext: add extended HDA bus")

I do not believe the second Fixes-tag is required as it's not connected directly with the fix you're providing.

Tag:
Suggested-by: Cezary Rojewski <cezary.rojewski@xxxxxxxxx>

would be most welcome though.

Also, if there would happen to be v3, please bundle Skylake and SOF patches together into a single patchset (still not a single patch!).

Signed-off-by: Yang Yingliang <yangyingliang@xxxxxxxxxx>

...

  sound/soc/intel/skylake/skl.c | 8 +-------
  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/sound/soc/intel/skylake/skl.c b/sound/soc/intel/skylake/skl.c
index bbba2df33aaf..3312b57e3c0c 100644
--- a/sound/soc/intel/skylake/skl.c
+++ b/sound/soc/intel/skylake/skl.c
@@ -689,11 +689,6 @@ static void load_codec_module(struct hda_codec *codec)
#endif /* CONFIG_SND_SOC_INTEL_SKYLAKE_HDAUDIO_CODEC */ -static void skl_codec_device_exit(struct device *dev)
-{
-	snd_hdac_device_exit(dev_to_hdac_dev(dev));
-}
-
  static struct hda_codec *skl_codec_device_init(struct hdac_bus *bus, int addr)
  {
  	struct hda_codec *codec;
@@ -706,12 +701,11 @@ static struct hda_codec *skl_codec_device_init(struct hdac_bus *bus, int addr)
  	}
codec->core.type = HDA_DEV_ASOC;
-	codec->core.dev.release = skl_codec_device_exit;
ret = snd_hdac_device_register(&codec->core);
  	if (ret) {
  		dev_err(bus->dev, "failed to register hdac device\n");
-		snd_hdac_device_exit(&codec->core);
+		put_device(&codec->core.dev);
  		return ERR_PTR(ret);
  	}

Shy question: why my suggestion seems reasonable, I did not test it yet, proposed it based on static analysis of the code. Did you test it?


Regards,
Czarek



[Index of Archives]     [ALSA User]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Pulse Audio]     [Kernel Archive]     [Asterisk PBX]     [Photo Sharing]     [Linux Sound]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux