On Mon, Oct 17, 2022 at 11:58:03AM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote: > On Mon, Oct 17, 2022 at 11:27 AM Andy Shevchenko > <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Mon, Oct 17, 2022 at 11:02:09AM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote: > > > On Mon, Oct 10, 2022 at 10:15 PM Andy Shevchenko > > > <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > > Currently the header inclusion inside the pinctrl headers seems more arbitrary > > > > than logical. This series is basically out of two parts: > > > > - add missed headers to the pin control drivers / users > > > > - clean up the headers of pin control subsystem > > > > > > > > The idea is to have this series to be pulled after -rc1 by the GPIO and > > > > pin control subsystems, so all new drivers will utilize cleaned up headers > > > > of the pin control. > > > > > > Aha I see you want to send a pull request so I backed out the applied patches > > > from the series for now. > > > > Can I consider all that you answered to as Rb tag? > > Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx> Thank you! > I haven't reviewed in detail but I fully trust you to do the right thing > and fix any fallout so will happily pull this. The plan is to push this to Linux Next for a couple of days and then I'll send PR to you and Bart. -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko
