On 9/26/22 03:34, Jason Zhu wrote: > > 在 2022/9/23 20:55, Mark Brown 写道: >> On Wed, Sep 21, 2022 at 10:37:06AM +0800, Jason Zhu wrote: >>> 在 2022/9/20 20:47, Mark Brown 写道: >>>> On Tue, Sep 20, 2022 at 11:45:45AM +0800, Jason Zhu wrote: >>>>> Sometimes we need to make some dais alive when close the card, like >>>>> VAD, so these functions must be exported so that they can be called. >>>> I'm not sure I fully understand the use case here - why wouldn't >>>> the core know about the audio stream being kept active? For >>>> something like VAD I'd expect this to be just working like a >>>> normal audio path, if there's a DSP consuming the audio stream >>>> then it'll keep everything open. If there is a good use case I >>>> suspect it'll be clearer if you send the users along with this >>>> patch. >>> Thanks. For example, we use the VAD(Voice Activity Detect) & PDM( >>> Pulse Density Modulation) to record sound>. The PDM is used to >>> record and copy data to DDR memory by DMA when the system is alive. >>> The VAD is used to detect voice from PDM and copy data to sram >>> (The sram is small) when the system is sleep. If the VAD detect >>> specific sound, wake up the system and continue to record sound. >>> The data can not be lost in this process. So we attach VAD & PDM >>> in the same card, then close the card and wake up VAD & PDM again >>> when the system is goto sleep. Like these code: >> This sounds like a very normal thing with a standard audio stream - >> other devices have similar VAD stuff without needing to open code access >> to the PCM operations? > > > At present, only VAD is handled in this way by Rockchip. > >> >>> When the system is waked up, open the sound card. The data in sram >>> is copied firstly and close the vad. Then use the DMA to move data >>> to DDR memory from PDM. >> Generally things just continue to stream the voice data through the same >> VAD stream IIRC - switching just adds complexity here, you don't have to >> deal with joining the VAD and regular streams up for one thing. > > > Yes, this looks complicated. But our chip's sram which is assigned to VAD > > maybe used by other devices when the system is alive. So we have to copy > > sound data in sram firstly, then use the DDR(SDRAM) to record sound data. There are other devices that requires a copy of the history buffer from one PCM device and a software stitching with the real-time data coming from another PCM device. It's not ideal but not uncommon either, even for upcoming SDCA devices, combining data from 2 PCM devices will be an allowed option (with additional control information to help with the stitching). That said, the usual practice for exporting symbols is to share additional patches that show why this was needed. A single patch in isolation is hard to review.
