On Fri, Sep 23, 2022 at 12:39:54PM +0800, Trevor Wu wrote: > On Thu, 2022-09-22 at 16:10 +0200, AngeloGioacchino Del Regno wrote: > > Il 22/09/22 15:30, Mark Brown ha scritto: > > > On Thu, Sep 22, 2022 at 07:26:21PM +0800, Tzung-Bi Shih wrote: > > > > > > > snd_soc_pm_ops[1] sets some more fields. I'm not quite sure > > > > whether > > > > it would introduce any side effect or not. Perhaps Trevor could > > > > provide some suggestions. > > > > > > If it does it should be to fix isues rather than introduce new > > > problems - I suspect the other operations just don't work > > > currently. > > > > From my upstream tests, this didn't introduce any issues, that's why > > I've > > sent this patch. > > > > In any case, let's check with Trevor, just as to be extremely sure, > > but please > > use an upstream kernel for eventual tests, as there are quite a bit > > of changes > > between 5.10 and current upstream. > > > > Cheers, > > Angelo > > I think it's not a big risk if Angelo already did the test and > snd_soc_pm_ops is also used in MT8186. > I can help do more tests on 5.10 when the patch is back to chromium in > the future. > MTK also have a plan to support complete suspend/resume functionality > in MT8195. If Tzung-bi has concerns about the patch, I can help submit > the patch at the time. I have no further concern as long as you guys are also aware of the change.
