On Thu, 8 Sep 2022 12:11:44 -0400, Nícolas F. R. A. Prado wrote:
> The i2s ports on MediaTek SoCs only support a single data lane. In order
> to achieve full-duplex operation thus two i2s ports, one for input and
> one for output, need to be used together and sharing a single clock from
> one of the ports.
>
> This clock sharing setting was previously read by the sound platform
> driver from the devicetree, but given that the input/output pairing is
> closely related to which codecs are connected to which ports, the
> machine sound driver can infer and set it, so that no DT property is
> required.
>
> [...]
Applied to
broonie/sound.git for-next
Thanks!
[01/10] ASoC: mediatek: mt8192: Allow setting shared clocks from machine driver
commit: 8ae4fcfd5b11b5c33154732fcad99ad0f5843ce2
[02/10] ASoC: mediatek: mt8192-mt6359: Make i2s9 share the clock from i2s8
commit: 3ffb9fa3963964a730c34f48e502ac0625efc145
[03/10] ASoC: mediatek: mt8192: Remove clock share parsing from DT
commit: 9ccd51ce396a46d9d4d0c87aa6a82dd26a2f281a
[04/10] ASoC: mediatek: mt8183: Allow setting shared clocks from machine driver
commit: fea84890e5c1fb65ae8e25b2f9b86363af1f45f2
[05/10] ASoC: mediatek: mt8183: Configure shared clocks
commit: 4583392a135cc30409f5a6ceebb8374e550b03e0
[06/10] ASoC: mediatek: mt8183: Remove clock share parsing from DT
commit: cbebe67859a0e8d51e578fdd9f927f8ef2504ba4
[07/10] arm64: dts: mediatek: kukui: Remove i2s-share properties
commit: b3821f7839c2ec322926d16557aff29f4be1f4dc
[08/10] ASoC: mediatek: mt8186: Allow setting shared clocks from machine driver
commit: 4132a778e806f77c2bd01a9a34b07edc9dd99d76
[09/10] ASoC: mediatek: mt8186: Configure shared clocks
commit: 9986bdaee4776c5d595933cace9d54c6bc084e91
[10/10] ASoC: mediatek: mt8186: Remove clock share parsing from DT
commit: 62da80c6a124dd68b12c4d2197ecc74b79823571
All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.
You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.
If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.
Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.
Thanks,
Mark
