On 09/09/2022 09:23, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > On 08/09/2022 16:35, Mark Brown wrote: >> On Thu, Sep 08, 2022 at 02:20:42PM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: >> >>> Anyway new properties cannot be accepted. This has to be converted to DT >>> schema (YAML). >> >> Doing a whole binding conversion feels like a bit of a steep requirement >> when people are just adding a simple property, it's a lot of stop energy >> to figure out the tooling, do the conversion and deal with all the >> bikeshedding that the tools don't catch. It's definitely nice if people >> want to look at that, for more complex binding changes it gets more >> reasonable but for trivial properties it's disproportionate. > > It's more than one property here and many patch submitters are using > this reason as well. In an effect few bindings TXT grew from 5 to 10 > properties in one year and still no conversion to YAML. > > I understand your concerns however I have stronger motivation to do the > conversion is stronger for me, than for accepting new features. Eh, that was still during drinking coffee, so it barely reminds English sentences. Let me try one more time: It's more than one property and many other patch submitters were using this reason as well. As a result, few TXT bindings grew from 5 to 10 properties within one year and there was still no conversion to YAML. I understand your concerns however I have stronger motivation to do the conversion, than for accepting new features. Best regards, Krzysztof
